The King's Speech 
are a demanding audience, and as such I feel a certain reluctance to historical films and costumes. Rebuilding stories whose testimonies are a few vague or too often leads to new interpretations of misleading or boring, the result of wrong intuitions and pseudo clever scripts. So what does The King's Speech a 'must see'? What makes it one of the fiercest competitors to the statuette Best Film and one of the best films of the year? The feeling, knowing how to touch the viewer to carry the story. The story of George V, King suffered from stuttering, is made as the drama of a man in front of his nation, the people who saw in him a light and a hope. The frustration of a man knowing that disappoint those who put trust in him, be to play a role beyond its capacity, the drama of a human being first, and after a king. Hooper staged a precise reconstruction and not excessive, the historical references are there to service the film and the story without dragging cotestualizzare But the caricaturist. The rest of the actors do a perfect ensemble interpretation, Colin Firth confirms the good things seen in A Single Man, Rush and Bonahm Carther govern the game perfectly. If the first thought that the Oscars would be a run-way, now I can say that The Social Network has a worthy rival.
